Skip to content
Core Sloth Hub

Will Different Countries Emulate Australia's Example in Restricting Social Media for Teenagers Under 16?

The Australian bold move to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are watching closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a rising chorus of countries are exploring similar measures.

  • The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that phones and networks are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". A law could be enacted in the coming year.
  • Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the algorithms".
  • The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban could be "an tools under consideration".
  • In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to pass a bill increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
  • In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
  • The administration in The Netherlands has advised families to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a non-binding statement calling for a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is granted. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a good first step," said one European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "supported by conclusive research".

Previously, interest grew behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. An organization set up by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to disturbing online content suggests that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for minors," stated a prominent peer.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

  • Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
  • Florida has signed a measure prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
  • Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further access requiring a guardian's okay.
  • Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced measures demanding parental consent for minors to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain individuals to copy Australia's example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, further nations are likewise exploring options.

  • The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
  • Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies adopt a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "could backfire". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

As this global conversation unfolds, the steps of this nation and its followers indicate that policymakers around the world are increasingly content to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.

By

Anita Rios

A software engineer and tech writer passionate about open-source projects and emerging technologies.

Core Sloth Hub

Type to search articles.